I'm often in the position where I see startups with plans that *don't make sense* to me, as business models or as research programs. Sometimes brilliant people with stellar career track records join these companies. Sometimes they get highly funded. I'm puzzled.
-
-
I've definitely made mistakes of the form "that's not possible, the technology isn't good enough/cheap enough" based on outdated information, and it turns out things have rapidly progressed since I last checked on the field.
Show this thread -
But simple logic stuff like "a plan that depends on A, B, *and* C going right is riskier than a plan that depends on A, B, *or* C going right" or "experimental evidence is more credible than correlational evidence, ceterus paribus, in ascertaining whether an intervention works"
Show this thread -
that kind of reasoning seems valid to me. Long chains of reasoning about an uncertain future are questionable, indeed -- that's why too much a priori reasoning is unwise -- but the logic I'm talking about is precisely *about* cutting down on model risk!
Show this thread -
I think *careful* and *humble* logical arguments *are* valid ways to assess the prospects of an early-stage project. Ultimately, of course, data talks, bullshit walks. But before the final data is in...
Show this thread -
The other possibility, of course, is that smart people join or fund early-stage startups with bad plans because they don't think the stated plan is actually a firm commitment. "If the plan is bad we can just change it later."
Show this thread -
This might make sense in a world with rapid & cheap market feedback, like consumer software. It seems *nuts* in biotech, where you're investing a lot in expensive physical equipment for something that won't pay you for ten years!
Show this thread -
True, if your plan is bad today, you can change it. But that means plan #2, or #3, or whatever, is going to have to actually get you from here to the big goal when nobody else yet has. And so, isn't the quality of plan #1 an indicator of how good the people are at planning?
Show this thread -
Do you think
@elonmusk doesn't have a plan to get to Mars? Like, not a marketing pitch, a plan that is his careful best assessment of the critical path from here to there?Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
"Pivot" ideology implies that long-run planning is pointless. It sounds like you've found funders outside this ideology.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.