"According to Husserl, all of our experiences and activities incorporate anticipation. He uses the term “protention” to refer to an anticipatory structure that is integral to our sense of the present."
-
Show this thread
-
"Husserl adds that localized experiences of problematic uncertainty and doubt arise against an enduring backdrop of habitual certainty." You might doubt whether a light in the distance is really an oncoming train, but you don't doubt that there is ground under your feet.
1 reply 0 retweets 8 likesShow this thread -
In Husserl's view, there is an underlying, invisible substrate of trust, more a disposition than a cognitive belief, that allows us to think and act at all without being paralyzed by fearful doubt.
1 reply 1 retweet 9 likesShow this thread -
"For the most part, such expectations do not take the form of explicit judgments. They are symptomatic of a habitual, practical confidence, a feeling of being more generally “at home” in the world."
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likesShow this thread -
"It is against this backdrop that we have more localized experiences of problematic uncertainty and doubt, and make explicit judgments to the effect that event p will, will not, or might not arise."
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likesShow this thread -
"Hence a non-localized sense of confidence or certainty is not itself an attitude toward anything specific but something that is already in place when such attitudes are adopted."
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likesShow this thread -
This generalized sense of confidence or trust is, the authors claim, what is destroyed in trauma, along with the implicit belief that one has a future, that it makes any sense to plan for the future.
1 reply 0 retweets 12 likesShow this thread -
It seems to me that the popularity of apocalypse narratives -- the widespread *felt sense* that there's no point in planning for anything ten years away (or even five years away!) because the world will have ended by then -- is due to this.
3 replies 1 retweet 12 likesShow this thread -
Hot take: anyone pressuring you to lose this "basal security" or "sense of trust", or anyone saying it is morally obligatory to lack it, is a bad person who is literally traumatizing you.
5 replies 2 retweets 26 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @s_r_constantin
What does this sort of pressure look like, in practice? I can understand the general idea but I'm having trouble imagining a concrete scenario/argument someone would make
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
"You think you're so great, having opinions you're unqualified to have, lol what a baby, you need adult supervision" or "god you're self-involved, thinking anybody *cares* what you want or believe".
-
-
Replying to @s_r_constantin @vblasv
As a response to these kinds of comments, you might think "I don't know what they want from me except generically being more timid, so I guess I'll just try to...shrink..."
0 replies 0 retweets 3 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.