I'm increasingly dissatisfied with "smart guy" archetypes or personality tropes. "The Sage", "The Magician", "Spock", "Athena", etc.
-
-
What if the "hero" doesn't value advice or information?
@robinhanson knows something about organizations not being willing to pay for info; it's also been my personal experience. A business that's selling "we can get you the right answer" is limited even if it excels.Show this thread -
What if you're "the smart one" and you're wrong sometimes? What if you have a desire or a talent that has nothing to do with being right? Who are you when you're not being "the smart one"?
Show this thread -
The most intelligent people I've ever met (e.g. Fields medalists) are married and have children. But "the smart one" as archetype never falls in love or cuddles a baby.
Show this thread -
Identifying yourself with being "rational" or a "thinker" seems like a bad move, for this reason. Reasoning & thinking are valuable skills. They're not identities or archetypes. Any "kind of person" can think. The uniform you wear can't guarantee you're right.
Show this thread -
Identifying as an "interesting" person seems like another trap. Sometimes the truth is basic and not that interesting. Sometimes it makes sense to be passionate, not "interested" in a detached way. Sometimes courage or effort matters more than new ideas.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.