The life-extension-skeptical theory I find most credible is "there is no conserved metabolic pathway governing lifespan that can be altered without serious harm to the organism. Aging is just overall damage/entropy; there is no "master switch" regulating its rate."
-
-
I, and most biogerontologists, are betting against the skeptical thesis, partly because there *is* evidence to suggest that lifespan is under genetic/hormonal control, and also for VOI reasons -- investigating in search of "master switches" could yield anti-aging drugs.
Show this thread -
Note that, if this approach works, it will completely fly in the face of everything drug development researchers are trained to do. Good pharma practice is to find "specific" drugs with single targets and well-understood effects.
Show this thread -
An anti-aging drug that modulates a global hormonal or metabolic pathway will do LOTS of things, not all of which we will understand ahead of time. This spooks experienced pharma researchers.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.