"Liberaltarian" opinions like this are appealing because they say "regardless of your values on wealth redistribution, surely we can all agree that at any given level of redistribution, method X is more economically efficient than Y?"https://twitter.com/StephanAJensen/status/1102691349881589761 …
-
-
But if they're pure win-wins, why don't we have them already? Because they work by reducing the discretion of gov'ts and oligopolies to play favorites. They're not friendly to logrolling, lobbying, spoils, etc.
Show this thread -
This is the stuff
@robinhanson has been talking about, and it's similar to public choice theory. There is active optimization towards policies that are *lose-lose* at the population level.Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.