Opens profile photo
Follow
Ryan Panchadsaram
@rypan
Co-author of . Advisor at . How can we make things better than we found them? Our planet, our communities, our tools.
San Franciscopanchadsaram.comJoined November 2006

Ryan Panchadsaram’s Tweets

Pinned Tweet
Did you know that while over 50% of Fortune Global 500 companies have a climate commitment, only 5% have a clear net zero goal for 2050 or earlier? That's less than 30 companies! If you work at one of these companies YOU can fix this 🧵from #VERGE22 on what to do ➡️
Image
Image
5
113
Show this thread
"China Wants to Be the OPEC of Renewables, but There’s Competition" - & barrons.com/articles/esg-c China has a significant head start. But the US and Europe are not sitting out of this race. 🇺🇸 Inflation Reduction Act + 🇪🇺 Green Deal Industrial Plan
Quote Tweet
💯 When the green premium plummets and becomes a green discount, market forces take over. And in markets, there are winners and losers. Not wanting to lose is a wildly powerful accelerant. twitter.com/AkshatRathi/st…
1
1
It’s not woke. It’s just a damn good stove. New testing by : “Induction ranges and cooktops in particular often heat the fastest, simmer steadily, and provide quicker temperature changes when you adjust a burner.”
1
3
💯 When the green premium plummets and becomes a green discount, market forces take over. And in markets, there are winners and losers. Not wanting to lose is a wildly powerful accelerant.
Quote Tweet
The climate theme for 2023 is competition not collaboration. Newest example. The French minister said he is now working on a European version of the US climate act for “bigger, faster and simpler” state aid for companies. bloomberg.com/news/articles/
Show this thread
1
3
Why I've become obsessed with methane (CH₄) and the 💃🪩🕺greenhouse gas dance🕺🪩💃 (I wish it were as fun as it sounds... interpretative dance submissions very welcome to lighten the mood)
Quote Tweet
Methane stays in the atmosphere for just over a decade, but cutting emissions is critical to slow short and long-term global warming. So how do we tackle the problem? In this episode, @shaylekann talks to @embrein, co-founder of @sparkclimate. 🎧 Listen: link.chtbl.com/MIellACQ
Embedded video
1:39
1.4K views
1
23
Show this thread
🔋 2/3 of 60,000 vehicles will be electric from Oshkosh 🔌 ~1/2 of 46,000 from mainstream automakers ⚡️ Beyond 2026, 100% electric! Every fossil fuel purchase lingers for 2 decades. Procurement is a powerful accelerant in ending tailpipe emissions!
1
10
An exceptionally American problem with remarkably simple solutions: 🚲 Build protected & separated lanes. 🚶🏾Build safer crossings & wider sidewalks. Want to fix your city? Ask your local officials to act. If we can build 26-lane freeways in 🇺🇸, we can do this too.
Quote Tweet
The exceptionally American problem of rising roadway fatalities: nytimes.com/2022/11/27/ups
Image
1
14
"Net zero pledges must be about cutting emissions, not corners.” - The made it very clear at #COP27 what a net zero commitment is. Integrity matters if we expect to cut emissions in half by 2030 & get to zero by 2050. See the report ⤵️ un.org/sites/un2.un.o
Image
Quote Tweet
Image
Image
Did you know that while over 50% of Fortune Global 500 companies have a climate commitment, only 5% have a clear net zero goal for 2050 or earlier? That's less than 30 companies! If you work at one of these companies YOU can fix this 🧵from #VERGE22 @GreenBiz on what to do ➡️
Show this thread
1
17
“In Am­s­ter­dam right now, 50% of all com­mutes are on a bike. That’s easy be­cause Am­s­ter­dam is flat…” No. It’s because it’s phenomenally safe to ride a bike there. Lots of flat cities in the 🇺🇸. We’re missing lanes that are separated from 🚗.
3
15
Investing in protected bike lanes will attract more people to make the switch — a critical step towards ending carbon pollution within our cities. Tag your mayor and city officials and tell them it’s time to make it happen!
1
24
Show this thread
We are running out of time, and we need wins. Electrifying buses and cars will take 12-15 YEARS... Adding rail to a city takes 10-20 YEARS... Nuclear...woof... If the will is there, creating protected lanes can take WEEKS to MONTHS. 7/8
2
19
Show this thread
🏆 How do we design our streets, so it is safe enough for an 8-year-old or an 80-year-old to ride by themselves? In a US survey, nearly 2/3 of residents said they “would be more likely to ride a bicycle if motor vehicles and bicycles were physically separated by a barrier.” 6/8
1
29
Show this thread
⚠️ Why don't more people ride bikes in the United States? Simple. It is not safe. Cyclists are six times more likely to die in the United States than in Germany, the Netherlands, or Denmark, where protected cycling infrastructure is the norm. 5/8
2
22
Show this thread
"Neutralizing to Net Zero" That's how you take aggressive action to eliminate your emissions while supporting the world's march to net zero. In the end, the goal is clear though: your company's emissions - your company's removal = net zero.
2
4
Show this thread
We need companies to do both Start investing in carbon removal for at least a tenth of a percent of your emissions. Go bigger if you are bolder. If you do, you are a carbon catalyst! Then buy high-quality reduction & protection offsets to neutralize your emissions.
Image
1
4
Show this thread
And other kinds of offsets? Reduction offsets (like investing in a wind farm or cleaner cooking stoves) or protection offsets (preventing deforestation) Definitionally, these don’t count towards being net zero, but they are critical for the world to get to net zero What to do?
1
3
Show this thread
But what about offsets? The definition for net zero by the UN and IPCC is anthropogenic emissions balanced by anthropogenic removals. Emissions. Removals. But today, there’s a lack of high-quality removal options, both nature-based and engineered.
1
2
Show this thread
Getting to net zero is going to require a transformation of our entire society. The playbook for companies ➡️ COMMIT: Set an ambitious goal CUT: Eliminate emissions by picking cleaner alternatives CONSERVE: Invest in energy efficiency REMOVE: Then remove what's left
Image
2
7
Show this thread
The three issues we found were: 1. Missing Scope 3 or have defined it down 2. Don’t cover all greenhouse gas types, only carbon 3. Don’t specify their carbon removal strategy Without these, you do not meet the definition of net zero. What to do? Set a clear goal ➡️
1
3
Show this thread
The plan is made up of OKRs: 10 objectives & 55 key results. We set a KR to track the commitments companies were making towards net zero. We went to *every* Fortune Global 500 company's website & dug into their ESG reports and PDFs. We found a few patterns...
1
3
Show this thread
More grants like this are needed to accelerate the production of sustainable air fuel But costs need to drop quicker! One category of flyer can afford the green premium: private aviation We need national or state policy requiring private jets to use SAF. Wonky but effective ✈️
Quote Tweet
LanzaJet's first plant will produce sustainable aviation fuel at the same cost as its fossil-fuel variety, thanks to "blended finance". One year after @Breakthrough created a $1 billion fund to support the building of a first-of-a-kind green technology: bloomberg.com/news/articles/
6
"It’s the core, it’s the heart, it’s the soul of our company..." Porsche's North Star should be to make a P911 that makes people forget there was ever a combustible engine. Just like Ford has done with their F-150...
Quote Tweet
Porsche IPO today, ticker P911. Oh, and it says it won't electrify its iconic model...yet bloomberg.com/news/articles/
2
10
"Exponential progress creates exponential opportunities. And to succeed, all of it needs to happen at an accelerating rate – faster every day." - , ,
Quote Tweet
🧵Something I'm thrilled to see out in the world: @VoyagerVC's decarbonization investment thesis. It's called Faster Every Day, and it's the why, what, and why now on an immense value creation from @sclarsic, @sierrap, and yours truly. You should read it. voyagervc.com/news-and-lette
Show this thread
8
Want to aggressively cut emissions inside your company? Set an internal carbon price. Empower teams to use those dollars towards investments that cut emissions or make things more efficient. Do it in 2022. Repeat in 2023, 2024, 2025...20XX
Quote Tweet
Want your internal carbon price to impact the way that your company works? Set up an internal fee, or create an internal trading platform for your internal carbon price. Want to have almost no impact? Rely on offsets. bloomberg.com/news/articles/
Image
1
10