Russell Neches

@ryneches

Ph.D. in microbiology from Jonathan Eisen's () lab at UC Davis, now at . Evolution & ecology. Open Hardware, Open Access, Open All The Things!

Oakland, CA
vort.org
Vrijeme pridruživanja: svibanj 2010.
1.576 fotografija ili videozapisa Fotografije i videozapisi

Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @ryneches

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @ryneches

  1. Prikvačeni tweet
    30. srp 2018.

    Do you work with phylogenetic trees with thousands or millions of taxa? Are you looking for a Python tool that makes this fast and simple? Try SuchTree! Guaranteed to cause 50% fewer brain aneurysms than the leading brand! Now peer-reviewed and citeable!

    26 proslijeđenih tweetova 78 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  2. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    prije 7 sati

    I agree with the piece. The quick retraction of the "uncanny" paper shows that peer review on works, in fact in my view much better than the current system based on 2-3 anonymous peer-reviewers prior to publication

    8 proslijeđenih tweetova 21 korisnik označava da mu se sviđa
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  3. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    prije 15 sati

    Wu et al. independently confirmed that the closest relatives to the virus are bat SARS-like Coronaviruses. 3/15

    1 reply 1 proslijeđeni tweet 11 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  4. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    prije 15 sati

    Zhou et al. identified the virus, sequenced the viral genome of 5 early patients, proving recent emergence of the virus due to sequence similarity between patients. 2/15

    1 reply 1 proslijeđeni tweet 9 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  5. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    prije 15 sati

    Alright. Inspired by this tweet, I decided to read all relevant preprints (about 30 in all). Here's what I've found, a thread. 1/15

    Calling all scientists with relevant domain experience. There are 313 results on for "coronavirus" right now. Almost none of them have attached reviews. Let's fix that by Monday morning. Who's with me?
    Prikaži ovu nit
    5 replies 153 proslijeđena tweeta 262 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  6. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    1. velj

    Authors of disputed “uncanny” 2019-nCoV preprint to voluntarily withdraw preprint: "It was not our intention to feed into the conspiracy theories...we appreciate the criticisms...and will get back with a revised version”

    259 proslijeđenih tweetova 585 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  7. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    2. velj

    Fellow and tweeps, there's a lot of preprints that could use your eyes on their methodology. Contribute to the global response by helping others evaluate the science. Here's my bit:

    Calling all scientists with relevant domain experience. There are 313 results on for "coronavirus" right now. Almost none of them have attached reviews. Let's fix that by Monday morning. Who's with me?
    Prikaži ovu nit
    6 proslijeđenih tweetova 4 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  8. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    1. velj
    Odgovor korisnicima

    A handful on medrxiv too!

    1 proslijeđeni tweet 4 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  9. 1. velj

    We have enormous power to decide among ourselves what the labor conditions of science are like. Right now, they are not so great for most of us. How we treat preprints is very much connected to how we treat junior scientists, which is a CRITICAL PROBLEM facing our community.

    3 proslijeđena tweeta 12 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  10. 1. velj

    Imagine a community where you can be wrong, in public, in writing, and instead of being shot down and humiliated, your colleagues rushed to your aid and helped you fix the errors in your science. Let's be THAT community.

    1 reply 5 proslijeđenih tweetova 22 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  11. 1. velj

    Imagine how much more creative and productive you could be if you could get feedback from your whole community while you were still developing your ideas. Imagine if that feedback was constructive and kindly meant. I want us to be THAT community.

    1 reply 3 proslijeđena tweeta 16 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  12. 1. velj

    We don't need to be outraged when we see something wrong with a preprint. We DO need to fix it. The preprint system calls for a higher degree of skepticism of the science, but ALSO a higher degree of compassion for the authors.

    1 reply 1 proslijeđeni tweet 14 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  13. 1. velj

    If we aren't participating in that process, we aren't living up to our responsibilities to our colleagues. It should not matter what the platform is. It could be a journal, or a preprint, or a blog post, or a tweet. The PRINCIPLES of peer review are the same.

    1 reply 8 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  14. 1. velj

    Just like regular journal articles don't work without editors and reviewers acting with personal integrity, preprints don't work without the community acting with integrity. Whatever you believe about preprints, you know that we all need our work checked.

    1 reply 7 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  15. 1. velj

    We could have, and we should have, spent those critical first few hours engaging with the authors to help them get a corrected draft up. We could have, and we should have, cared about them as colleagues. We could have, and we should have, acted like a community.

    1 reply 11 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  16. 1. velj

    After some reflection on the on Pradhan et al. (the infamous "Uncanny similarity" preprint), I have some thoughts. The analysis and interpretation is certainly flawed, but that is not a reason to pillory its AUTHORS. We expect preprints to have flaws. That is what they are for.

    1 reply 12 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  17. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    1. velj

    No 2019-nCoV is not an escaped bioweapon

    1 reply 25 proslijeđenih tweetova 31 korisnik označava da mu se sviđa
    Poništi
  18. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    1. velj

    Reviewing cannot be easier. In seconds you can install in your browser or work directly on the platform. It's open and it's free.

    Calling all scientists with relevant domain experience. There are 313 results on for "coronavirus" right now. Almost none of them have attached reviews. Let's fix that by Monday morning. Who's with me?
    Prikaži ovu nit
    17 proslijeđenih tweetova 16 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  19. 1. velj

    There is more than one way to do this. You can post your reviews directly to as comments, or you can use . Look at all these preprints with ZERO reviews! Those zeros should guilt you EVERY BIT as much as a review request from your favourite editor.

    1 reply 7 proslijeđenih tweetova 17 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  20. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    1. velj
    Odgovor korisnicima

    Familiar with ? https://t.co/bVxxeB4S0U

    📢 We are proud to announce Outbreak Science Rapid PREreview (), a platform for the rapid review of outbreak-related preprints. Please, help us spread the word!
    Prikaži ovu nit
    2 proslijeđena tweeta 13 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  21. 1. velj

    I am calling on our partners in industry -- , , , , , , -- to review these preprints and make sure your products are being used appropriately. You employ some of the best minds in our world!

    1 reply 6 proslijeđenih tweetova 16 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi

@ryneches još nije objavio nijedan Tweet.

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·