I’ve listened to this at least a dozen times. Gets better every time.https://twitter.com/theintercept/status/989587341424627712 …
-
-
What action did you take to verify that the recording was Gil? Anyone who knows Gil can hear that its not him.
-
Waiting still for this answer
-
Wow. Independent voice analysis shows 1. Recording is not Gil Cisneros and 2. recording was likely doctored. https://cisnerosforcongress.com/app/uploads/2018/04/Voice-Recording-Analysis-C.pdf …
-
Thanks for sharing, appreciate this, will add.
-
Funny the story appears unchanged from your last update
-
Ah now it is and turns out even the expert you consulted doesn't buy it was Cisneros - way to go guys.pic.twitter.com/iDK4Qxtmy0
-
And decided to publish it anyway. He definitely can't be trusted ever again.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
You do that. Pretty soon Cisneros & his attorneys will own
@theintercept, which would be a marked improvement
pic.twitter.com/WQx5LOJH25Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Ummmmm ... Jesus, Ryan.
-
It's like the intercept is a "slam book".
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
You’re pretty awful.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.