Ryan, the voicemail is clearly not Gil. I recommend you take this down immediately as we explore what our legal options are. @ddayen
I’ve listened to this at least a dozen times. Gets better every time.https://twitter.com/theintercept/status/989587341424627712 …
-
-
-
Fair to characterize this as a denial from the campaign?
-
Adding that to our story, thanks
-
What action did you take to verify that the recording was Gil? Anyone who knows Gil can hear that its not him.
-
Waiting still for this answer
-
Wow. Independent voice analysis shows 1. Recording is not Gil Cisneros and 2. recording was likely doctored. https://cisnerosforcongress.com/app/uploads/2018/04/Voice-Recording-Analysis-C.pdf …
-
Thanks for sharing, appreciate this, will add.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Dude, I know Gil Cisneros and that’s not Gil Cisneros. Did you make any effort at all to authenticate before just asserting it was him in your piece? Or was this just an amusing story that fit a broader narrative and thus was “too good to check”?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What did you do to confirm that the voice is Gil? You owe readers that.
-
What steps did the Intercept take to confirm that the voice on the VM was Gil?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Ryan - what steps did The Intercept take to verify the phone message? Come on man.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.