it’s a lovely short hand that puts the two candidates on completely even footing despite the fact that one has been serving in the legislature for years, and the other has never held public office.
-
Show this thread
-
so what is so “centrist” about Whitmer? apparently it’s her stance on supporting the ACA, vs pushing single payer. Which of course she does - you can’t get single payer through a GOP legislature.https://theintercept.com/2018/02/22/gretchen-whitmer-executives-are-working-hard-against-a-pro-single-payer-candidate-for-governor/ …
1 reply 1 retweet 4 likesShow this thread -
Whitmer consistently stood up for the left during her time in senate. Remember “rape insurance”? Remember when House members where silenced for having the audacity to say “vagina” during abortion debate? That was Whitmer and her female colleagues working together.
2 replies 1 retweet 5 likesShow this thread -
there is a segment of the left that finds it extremely convenient to wipe out years of legislative experience fighting for issues that matter to progressives by throwing out the word “centrist” and claiming that’s enough to merit voting for someone else, with no basis.
2 replies 6 retweets 23 likesShow this thread -
I thought maybe we’d learned a lesson on that. I guess I was wrong.
1 reply 0 retweets 8 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @robinmarty
Wait a minute, in that sentence that you clipped, all I said was that the race has largely been covered that way. Do you disagree? Separately, do you disagree that El-Sayed is running to her left? I'm not placing value judgments--aren't those facts?
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ryangrim @robinmarty
And yes, like you said, it's a shorthand. By definition, a shorthand erases lots of other stuff. That's why it's called a shorthand. I definitely do get tired of words like progressive, centrist, establishment, etc, but what are better shorthands? They're not the same politically
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ryangrim
you could have used “establishment” and “anti-establishment” or “party supported” and “insurgent” or any number of distinctions that didn’t erase the fact that she is a longstanding politician and one with yes, a progressive record- policies she’s voted on again and again.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @robinmarty
establishment is also deeply loaded now and I try to avoid it. Surprised to hear that would have been preferable.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ryangrim
At least establishment would acknowledge the fact that she isn’t a newcomer and has been part of party leadership
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
I figured that the fact that she was a front runner for governor says in itself that she’s quite a serious candidate
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.