okay for real, what is this even?pic.twitter.com/YcoA97jKHa
Show this thread
-
I thought maybe we’d learned a lesson on that. I guess I was wrong.
Show this thread
Wait a minute, in that sentence that you clipped, all I said was that the race has largely been covered that way. Do you disagree? Separately, do you disagree that El-Sayed is running to her left? I'm not placing value judgments--aren't those facts?
-
-
And yes, like you said, it's a shorthand. By definition, a shorthand erases lots of other stuff. That's why it's called a shorthand. I definitely do get tired of words like progressive, centrist, establishment, etc, but what are better shorthands? They're not the same politically
-
centrist is an extremely loaded word, especially to your audience. She’s not a lipinksi-esque dem and that’s what this appears to imply. Having a challenger even further left than you doesn’t make you a centrist by default.
-
we called him right wing
-
Also, this was to my newsletter (thanks for reading!) that goes more to Clinton rather than Bernie folks, actually.
-
Dude, I’ve been part of your newsletter since it started back at huffpo I think :)
-
Yay! (But seriously, I don’t have facebook-level data, but my sense is that a majority of the subscribers were for clinton over bernie; it was not meant as a dig, just describing how the media have covered that race)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Also, it's not a story about Whitmer or El-Sayed, so we don't really go into either of their backgrounds. It's about Shri.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.