LOL they are dedicated to creating safe spaces for conservatives to spew lies. They call it "provocative" and want to encourage "debate," albeit the discussion is about a fantasy universe that only exists in conservative fever dreams. So the usefulness is kind of hard to see...
Feinstein failed to get the party endorsement, not nomination. One would mean she can't run, the other is mostly symbolic! Will the NYT have the courage to correct this idiocy or is it too scared of the Republicans on staff? https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/01/opinion/mona-charen-never-trumper.html …pic.twitter.com/o4Hdf6usa5
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I support Diane. I am put off by the ageist/sexist discrimination I am seeing. Show me some old men that are being replaced! I will donate directly to Diane and Nancy and let the party rot in hell with its youthful enthusiasm.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Hey, when you're Stephens ya gotta Stephens the hell out of stuff
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.