Here’s one of their adshttps://youtu.be/fo84pMMgI44
Show this thread
A collection of progressive groups, led by NARAL, SEIU and HRC, say they’ve raised more then a million dollars to spend backing @Marie4Congress against @RepLipinski
Lipinski could become the first Dem incumbent casualty of the fired-up Dem base
-
New conversation
-
-
-
I see very little to evidence Marie's "progressive" bonifidies. No explicit policy proposals (e.g. single payer, green new deal, $15+ minimum wage, end to militarism, proportionate rep.) are outlined leaving her conveniently non- committal. Makes sense that HRC would back her.pic.twitter.com/qbYXqyvL6w
-
Isn't she a justice democrat ?
-
So it would appear, for whatever that is worth. This is from Justice Democrats' website. The link where it says "read more" simply links to her website that I took screen shots from, and posted in my tweet above.pic.twitter.com/SzpxeVwgJn
-
I think if you're a justice democrat you can't take corporate money or PAC money and you support a platform which includes a Medicare for all
-
That would be something at least. Look through her website, read the screen shots I've taken. It's not difficult to have explicit positions on a number of issues. When one does not, that is NOT an oversight. There is the standard corporate language, "growing good jobs" etc.
-
That's not good, I'll check it out
-
Hi! I am endorsed by the
@justicedems — I’ve taken no corporate money. I’m sorry you didn’t see where I stood on min wage; you’ll see that I believe in $15 min wage in this article (other articles clearly list all of my positions as well):https://theintercept.com/2018/01/29/dan-lipinski-illinois-3rd-district-marie-newman/ … -
Thank you for the link. May I ask, why your positions are not clearly, and unambiguously outlined on your website?
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.