who's going back and reading all those old stories? They're coming for the ACA right now as we speak. Updating old stories that arent being read doesn't seem kuje a good use of time. If there's some code that could do it, then I don't see why not
-
-
Replying to @ryangrim
I assume passage of time does not mean you no longer care about accuracy and context of stories. A simple search can find the stories. Same update can be attached to all stories. Doesn't seem hard to me.
5 replies 14 retweets 76 likes -
-
Replying to @neeratanden
I'm open to the idea, but worry about setting a precedent that all old stories be updated not because they're inaccurate, but with new info. Should we go back and update all the Keystone stories with the news of the spill? Where does it end?
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @ryangrim @neeratanden
I edited most of those stories. They were totally accurate. The provenance of the emails, in retrospect, is fascinating and troubling, but doesn't take away from their often breathtaking newsworthiness, then and now, i.e.: https://theintercept.com/2016/10/07/excerpts-of-hillary-clintons-paid-speeches-to-goldman-sachs-finally-leaked/ … 1/2
6 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
The Intercept, where I no longer work, might just as well add an "UPDATE: Hillary Clinton lost to Donald Trump. If more of these secrets had come out earlier, Democratic Party leaders might have rallied behind a nominee who was not so profoundly deficient and compromised." 2/2
12 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
How bout this. "UPDATE: The Intercept was a willing participant in a foreign intel services info op. We knew at the time that Guccifer 2.0 was an arm of Russian intelligence but decided we didn't care bc...fuck Hillary Clinton."
1 reply 1 retweet 8 likes -
Replying to @Wilson__Valdez @froomkin and
PS- (And this one is actually serious). How has no one at The Intercept released their contacts (emails/DMs) with Guccifer 2.0? We know that he sought out your reporters. We knew that 'he' was GRU. Seems like that would be a big part of the story, especially for transparency.
2 replies 0 retweets 8 likes -
Ask sincerely and you shall receive:https://theintercept.com/2017/07/14/just-six-days-after-trump-jr-s-meeting-guccifer-2-0-emailed-me-but-there-was-one-key-difference/ …
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
So a story about a guy who didn't work at the intercept and didn't publish any stories... That's what you're going with?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
I didn’t work there either! Moving on then....
4:27 PM - 17 Nov 2017
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.