Cc @ryangrim. Sincere request here.https://twitter.com/neeratanden/status/931189391967576064 …
-
Penny for your thoughts Ryan
I'm open to the idea, but worry about setting a precedent that all old stories be updated not because they're inaccurate, but with new info. Should we go back and update all the Keystone stories with the news of the spill? Where does it end?
-
-
I edited most of those stories. They were totally accurate. The provenance of the emails, in retrospect, is fascinating and troubling, but doesn't take away from their often breathtaking newsworthiness, then and now, i.e.: https://theintercept.com/2016/10/07/excerpts-of-hillary-clintons-paid-speeches-to-goldman-sachs-finally-leaked/ … 1/2
-
I find it fascinating how European media treated wikileaks dumps was so different than you, others here did Dan. Perhaps rather than rationalize your actions, you'll think about that. Fact that your source was colluding w the Trump campaign doesn't make you think any differently?
-
Two ways to look at this Neera: 1. Either these people are too fucking dumb to see what was obvious to millions, that Assange was colluding w Trump & Russia, or 2. They are too fucking cynical & live for clicks, truth & decency be damned
-
Nonetheless, it exposes the rot that’s set inside the journalism profession & why people view most journalists with abject disregard
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It ends when one partisan feels that her ideology has been reflected in every medium she can find.
#history can be#revised#adnauseum to suit political purposes.#resistneeratandenThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.