Cc @ryangrim. Sincere request here.https://twitter.com/neeratanden/status/931189391967576064 …
-
-
Replying to @neeratanden
How would the update read? Sincere reply: the emails were authentic. The motivation of the hackers (presumably Russia) and the publisher (Wikileaks) are very interesting/newsworthy, but don't reflect on the emails themselves, right?
15 replies 5 retweets 30 likes -
Replying to @ryangrim
The update could read at the top that the emails were stolen, that US authorities find they were stolen by Russia and the source providing them was colluding with the Trump campaign- link to today's story. All true. So why not add for your readers' understanding?
4 replies 18 retweets 67 likes -
Replying to @neeratanden
who's going back and reading all those old stories? They're coming for the ACA right now as we speak. Updating old stories that arent being read doesn't seem kuje a good use of time. If there's some code that could do it, then I don't see why not
8 replies 1 retweet 4 likes -
Replying to @ryangrim
I assume passage of time does not mean you no longer care about accuracy and context of stories. A simple search can find the stories. Same update can be attached to all stories. Doesn't seem hard to me.
5 replies 14 retweets 76 likes -
Replying to @neeratanden @ryangrim
If he were sincere that wouldn’t even be up for debate, they’d simply do it
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes
"if he were sincere" You make it so pleasant to have these conversations!
-
-
Asking nicely- issue retraction, delete articles, publish article refuting past smears
0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.