Cc @ryangrim. Sincere request here.https://twitter.com/neeratanden/status/931189391967576064 …
-
The update could read at the top that the emails were stolen, that US authorities find they were stolen by Russia and the source providing them was colluding with the Trump campaign- link to today's story. All true. So why not add for your readers' understanding?
who's going back and reading all those old stories? They're coming for the ACA right now as we speak. Updating old stories that arent being read doesn't seem kuje a good use of time. If there's some code that could do it, then I don't see why not
-
-
I assume passage of time does not mean you no longer care about accuracy and context of stories. A simple search can find the stories. Same update can be attached to all stories. Doesn't seem hard to me.
-
Penny for your thoughts Ryan
-
I'm open to the idea, but worry about setting a precedent that all old stories be updated not because they're inaccurate, but with new info. Should we go back and update all the Keystone stories with the news of the spill? Where does it end?
-
I edited most of those stories. They were totally accurate. The provenance of the emails, in retrospect, is fascinating and troubling, but doesn't take away from their often breathtaking newsworthiness, then and now, i.e.: https://theintercept.com/2016/10/07/excerpts-of-hillary-clintons-paid-speeches-to-goldman-sachs-finally-leaked/ … 1/2
-
I find it fascinating how European media treated wikileaks dumps was so different than you, others here did Dan. Perhaps rather than rationalize your actions, you'll think about that. Fact that your source was colluding w the Trump campaign doesn't make you think any differently?
-
Two ways to look at this Neera: 1. Either these people are too fucking dumb to see what was obvious to millions, that Assange was colluding w Trump & Russia, or 2. They are too fucking cynical & live for clicks, truth & decency be damned
-
Nonetheless, it exposes the rot that’s set inside the journalism profession & why people view most journalists with abject disregard
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Ok. Release yours then :) I’d find The Intercept’s internal communications interesting. And that seems to be enough to make sth newsworthy nowadays
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This is a terrible answer Ryan. Why don't you tell her you would include in the story that the US authorities claim without proof they were stolen by Russia and the authorities can't be trusted b/c they have become political hacks and they haven't even looked at DNC servers.
-
Same folks (Perkins Coie) who hired Fusion GPS for DNC hired Crowdstrike. Here is our IC avoiding the evidence like the plague.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SqIY8KvuoJo …
New conversation -
-
-
How many articles are there? You guys have interns right? They could cut and paste it in an hour or two tops. And yes, you could probably use some code for it too if you wanted to save on that. Being credible for posterity is a good use of time.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Is you is, or is you ain't supposed to be a journalist?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
She's obsessed. Don't engage
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This is an astounding response. 25% low self-esteem, 25% slack, 50% self-own.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.