You know, maybe @carterforva could tell @alexnpress, @ryangrim, et al that in fact about 40-50% of his money came from Dem party/SuperPACs
Show this thread
-
The other part of this article that's dumb is - isn't it logical for the party to back off somewhat if the candidate isn't communicating with them?
Wait, so did the party support him? Or not support him because he didn't communicate with the party? Can yall reconvene and sync up and then come back to me?
-
-
Why don’t you just look at his campaign finance reports? And not selectively, like Fang did.
-
The irony of the whole thing is the broader story is about how the election showed these bullshit twitter wars are actually meaningless in the end. So we can do this, or not, and it doesn't matter. So let's not.
-
Hey, it’s not “we.” I’m not responsible for what you do with your reputation.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
dude, are you a reporter or what? Is everyone at The Intercept required to be a thin-skinned baby when confronted w/ adverse facts?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You're the fucking reporter, why don't you investigate for yourself?? Jesus H. Christ whatever they're paying you, it's too much.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
They supported him in some ways, but not in other ways that involved or required regular communication?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.