On the contrary, incompetence seems to have become a requirement for all aspects of the job.
In Trump's defense, his firing of Comey poured gasoline on the investigation. Is incompetence in obstructing justice a mitigating factor?
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
that seems to basically be the RNC defense here
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No it is not, no intention required, it's the ACT of FIRING Comey to stop the investigation that is obstruction (not words over dinner).
-
If the HRC investigation proved anything it's that intent is all that matters... if you're rich and powerful.
-
GOP caught b/c when they tried impeachment of Bill Clinton, "intent" was found to not be necessary for obstruction to have been committed.
-
It's a different world after Comey's original announcement about Hillary's intent.
-
I think we're talking apples/oranges here. Impeachment standards set by Sen/GOP found no intent is required for Pres to have obstructed
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Perhaps at sentencing?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.