Ryan GrimVerified account

I just don't see it happening. People don't like to lose what they have for vague promises of something better.

can't have a debate until you stake a position. What we can't do is allow "ACHA-lite" to be where we start.

Sure, but we just defended ACA as the place to start. People are attached to the good parts of it. Build on that.

a realistic step is lowering Medicare eligibility age in steps over time: 62, 59 1/2, 55, etc. a "compromise" of this

I'd like to see who votes against it so they can be replaced in congress.

.@Thurguston1 (1) good luck getting it out of cmte, & (2) good luck getting McConnell to bring it to the floor for a vote. Not happening

heh. primary over #dreamworldcare fortunately, this anchor won't make it out of committee.

What's with the stupid people?

dunno, but it is nice that they are self-identifying, makes it easier to scroll by.

Bros?

yup. although there appears to be plenty of both genders.

so, busty and bro

please no

why no? Medicare for all is better than the current system and it has public support. They have nothing to lose.

"they have nothing to lose"=incredibly false statement. Just expand ACA as HRC intended & Obama wanted @ryangrim

wait, you would rather have the ACA expanded than have guaranteed healthcare for all Americans? I don't get it.

I guess you don't @ryangrim

no, I really don't. You're not a progressive if you don't think every American having healthcare would be better.

lol. You just changed the question didnt you? You want to define yourself as progressive or expand enduring care? @ryangrim

in fact you can't be a progressive if you reject ANY expansion of care that is secure enough to last @ryangrim