This self-written article headline spontaneously became more accurate. @Uber @ryangrim @JonathanCohnpic.twitter.com/yNmiEwSLIZ
So Uber knows a tech flaw could kill bikers but rolled it out anyway, against the law. Do RICO statutes apply here?https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/dec/19/uber-self-driving-cars-bike-lanes-safety-san-francisco?CMP=twt_gu …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@hypervisible@guardian It means foreseeability, willfulness, reckless endangerment, potential punitive after inj. Now AZ's prob. -
AZ Gov, knowing these things, welcomed Uber AVs anyway, did zero to ensure safety, protect AZ cyclists. Gov. is immune, Uber not.
-
Uber's answer was to make human drivers take over for right turns across bike lanes.(Stanford study says handovers dangerous too.)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
yep. Rahm is DEFINITELY the guy for this job
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
depends on the "crime(s)" committed.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
San Francisco is banning the Uber cars.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.