it's funny because this article has about the same amount of serious empirical analysis as yours.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Do you understand that Nate can say that Trump has a <20% chance of getting Nom, Trump gets the Nom, and Nate was still not wrong?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Tuesday's going to be fun when Nate is right and all you guys are stunned about what happened.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
it assumes unskewing=TLA. US=pulling from raw data poll, TLA=statistical anLYs that looks at past polls w/o pulling raw data
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Do you understand how probabilities work? What is your math background? You seem clueless.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Nate has Florida, North Carolina, and Nevada all going to Trump. Actual results on Tuesday, best 2 out of 3 wins.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I'm a Nate fan from his days as Poblano. It is clear that he is under pressure from above to keep the horse race going.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Ryan, have you ever looked at the 2015 UK election polls? If the samples aren't balanced right you can run all the polls you like
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Shh. Accept the Bayesian, don't write articles on statistics 'till then
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Funny, it doesn't say anything at all grossly wrong about statistics.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.