This article is so fucking idiotic and irresponsible.https://twitter.com/ryangrim/status/794993465666994180 …
-
-
Be a grownup.
-
which one?
-
the 'thinks he knows his shit but clearly doesnt' Huffpo writer.
-
thanks. agreed
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
You publicly shame someone in an area they know far more about than you do and "sick burn, bro" is your retort?
-
Actually Ryan makes a very strong argument. Why is Nate's model so different than all the others?
-
and if you actually want the answer to thishttp://fivethirtyeight.com/features/election-update-why-our-model-is-more-bullish-than-others-on-trump/ …
-
What I want the answer to is ... why has Nate stopped following his own fundamental rules?
-
3 weeks ago he had Clinton at 90%, so I don't think he's biased against her
-
I don't think so. And I never accused him of that. He's just stopped following some of his own rules.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I found your article confusing and unclear on what yo mean by trenline adjustment and why you think it's bad
-
you just say it's bad. I'd prefer a more technically deep, empirically grounded critique
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
was that a shaded homophobic slur?
-
I think non-bro has more to do with the fact that Nate is nerdy.
-
k...I'm dubious but whatever, it was still childish and shitty
-
Very much so.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
it actually is when you read the rest of his tweets. would love to see a detailed response from you…
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What a childish response. Nate has destroyed your article in a series of tweets, best for you to move on from this.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.