I love Ryan, but this doesn't have anything to do with anything, morally speaking. Scummy people's $$ can do good.https://twitter.com/ryangrim/status/767811188117925889 …
-
Ryan's point, I think, was to be skeptical that all of these donors were motivated by pure altruism.
exactly. And they're not stupid/in the business of wasting money.
-
-
You have to measure that against: a) the good the $$ did, regardless of motivation; b) blocking influence seeking.
-
Look, Clintons should shut it down when she wins and stop contributions now. But that doesn't mean the $$ didn't do
-
good. Question is who was playing who-did Clintons give these people things or did they con them out of $$ for nada?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.