Buddy, you gotta read more broadly: http://news.wgbh.org/2016/05/10/politics-government/politics-usual-or-federal-crime-us-attorneys-reign-terror-about-end …https://twitter.com/danielmarans/status/751802126549082113 …
@danielmarans Right. We just did a little clip job with some good quotes. So why the freak out?
(Yes, we interviewed that guy)
-
-
What irked me was Dan's assertion that the Boston media (his phrase) are giving Ortiz a free pass. Way too broad.
-
#notallbostonmedia are bad. No doubt. (I take the same exception when folks attack the beltway media, so I hear u) -
Ha! And, you've put your finger on it. I'll cop to some Boston/public media defensiveness.
-
Reilly, you got proof an AUSA lied in court to keep a serial killer on the street. You punted. Sit down!
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Wouldn't say I "freaked out," btw--just noted, pointedly, that that characterization was off base.
-
oh, I meant the weird freak out by other Boston press
-
Good Q, and I'm not sure. One possibility: there's a fascination (founded) w/ back-channel Boston City Hall maneuvering.
-
If anything, I've seen indifference with this story. But the two authors seem to want a freak out.
-
no, indifference is what meets most of my stories. This was something different. I think Adam's guess is the best one
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.