The Feds don't usually grant immunity unless the person gave them something actionable.https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/in-clinton-email-investigation-justice-department-grants-immunity-to-former-state-department-staffer/2016/03/02/e421e39e-e0a0-11e5-9c36-e1902f6b6571_story.html …
-
@ryangrim@adamgoldmanwp correct. Immunity is granted in exchange for cooperation.
@JGolinkin @adamgoldmanwp but you typically only get it if you have something they want too
-
-
@ryangrim@adamgoldmanwp 100% correct. Actually, you ONLY get it if you have something they want. -
@JGolinkin@ryangrim What do you make part of article about Clinton case being less than Petraeus case and the latter casting a shadow? -
@JoshCrawfordNE@ryangrim Feds want to know what discussions happened that lead to this decision. Was it calculated? If so, big problem. -
@JGolinkin@JoshCrawfordNE what if it was calculated, but calculated for a non criminal purpose, like convenience? -
@ryangrim@JoshCrawfordNE if they determine it was really that simple, no charges. Recklessness is not criminally culpable conduct.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.