cc @GlennKesslerWP MT @elisefoley re: post questioning 1.5 mil figure, here’s another referencehttp://bit.ly/1uRRROM
-
-
Replying to @ryangrim
@ryangrim@elisefoley Hmm, interesting. Worthy of an update!1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @GlennKesslerWP
@GlennKesslerWP@elisefoley Wait, what's your source for saying 5 million will take this up? It's obviously about who was made eligible...1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @ryangrim
@ryangrim@elisefoley If you read the Interpreters Release analysis at the time, you will see the "made eligible" circle was much, much less1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GlennKesslerWP
@GlennKesslerWP@elisefoley The Bush WH told Congress it would make 1.5mm eligible. Nobody cried constitutional foul. That's the point.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ryangrim
@ryangrim@elisefoley actually what I was fact checking was the accuracy of the number. there's a big difference between 100,000 and 1.5 mi3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GlennKesslerWP
@GlennKesslerWP No, u challenge the comparison.Did the Bush WH tell Congress the policy would protect $1.5mm? Yes. Did Congress cry foul? No1 reply 2 retweets 2 likes
@GlennKesslerWP Better lede for you: The first Bush administration did in fact tell Congress its new policy would protect 1.5 million un...
-
-
Replying to @ryangrim
@ryangrim@Schultz44@GlennKesslerWP ...you just don't get it, doesn't matter who did what when. Americans don't want criminals (illegals).0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.