Isn't it possible @esullivanap was working a story on a topic she has well covered, vs govt "handing" a story to her? @ryangrim @johnjcook
@mattapuzzo also that would've been a good reason for her to take my calls or emails...
-
-
@ryangrim ok. But her long history on this topic http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2010/03/10/behind_the_scenes_crafting_the_us_no_fly_list/ … and http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/1249014 … is googleableThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@ryangrim as is the fact that she won a Pulitzer for exposing govt programs and DOJ seized her phone records. She's no govt shill. Fact. -
@mattapuzzo (the Pulitzer part is in there btw, but totally fair to flesh that out) -
@ryangrim thanks. You get, right, that I'm not defending govt? Opposed to portraying @esullivanap as a stenographer when her record is clear -
@mattapuzzo Yes, though on this particular piece, she didn't do herself any favors. She was writing fast, it happens -
@ryangrim Filing fast is what AP does. And filing 3 grafs is standard procedure. It's called a APNewsNow. Comes off in your story as weird.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@ryangrim That context was missing, regardless of what NCTC did, right or wrong.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.