I asked longtime Wall St Journal reporter if he'd ever seen a correction like WSJ's on this Balko article. A: Never http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424127887323848804578608040780519904 …
@MarkAmesExiled he could tell you the whole story. But DoE saying their people who carry guns, armor and do raids aren't SWAT isn't credible
-
-
@ryangrim So he hasn't refuted it -
@ryangrim Where? And if he's right why did the WSJ correction stand? -
@MarkAmesExiled because it's a judgment call and WSJ sided with power. Shocking.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@ryangrim also how is the WSJ editorial page less credible than a tobacco lobbyist who spent over a decade on the Kochs' payroll? -
@MarkAmesExiled I just mean that the DoE's claim it's not a SWAT team is silly. Of course it is, whatever they call it
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.