@nameitchangeit a reporter's job is to describe and tell the story of what he sees, in as rich detail as possible. sorry, that's not sexist
-
-
Replying to @jonward11
@jonward11@nameitchangeit I've noticed you don't see Sanford's outfit quite as richly as you see Colbert Busch's. "Positive vibes?" Please.1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @MaraSaysThings
@MaraAlyseGH pretty harsh criticism, you're right2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jonward11
.
@jonward11 we'd be happy to give presentation of our research to@HuffPostPol team w/@celindalake to better explain the effects@ryangrim2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @nameitchangeit
@nameitchangeit@jonward11@celindalake We actually had y'all over, then you named us most sexist news organization in the country2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ryangrim
.
@ryangrim@jonward11 that's why we offer, let us present our research1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @nameitchangeit
@nameitchangeit just read your blog post.@jonward11 described both what Colbert Busch and Sanford were wearing. You owe an apology.2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @ryangrim
.
@ryangrim@jonward11 We noted that. In fact mostly we were wondering if Sanford's clothing was meant to balance mentions of her clothing?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @nameitchangeit
@nameitchangeit@ryangrim it was meant to describe the scene, because that's called journalism4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jonward11
.
@jonward11 1/2 yr article mentioned the man's AND the woman's clothing. That's fair because it doesn't treat her differently@ryangrim2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@nameitchangeit @jonward11 thank you for changing
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.