U tweetove putem weba ili aplikacija drugih proizvođača možete dodati podatke o lokaciji, kao što su grad ili točna lokacija. Povijest lokacija tweetova uvijek možete izbrisati. Saznajte više
The NYT is doing a genuine public service by publicly discrediting and undermining the credibility of the NYT editorial board. Kudos.
Judge me if you want, but I watch plenty of reality TV, and this is just bad reality TV. I can’t believe they’re even doing the Top Chef talk-about-the-meal-thing before they announce who wins and goes on to the next episode in Iowa, and who has to take their knives and go home.
My wife and I have an annual ritual to watch the documentary “Citizen King” around MLK Day. Here was a little gem which seems appropriate given the hoopla around the NYT endorsement...pic.twitter.com/6uSuIAm5s8
Why the hell should I or anyone care what they think about who we should nominate?
I’ve been asking myself this all weekend. Like I honestly don’t care. I just like the clips that they pulled out of Bernie.
The @sunrisemvmt has a much more sophisticated vetting/endorsement process than the @nytimes and they're kids.
Quite literally: "write down your favorite two candidates on a piece of paper" 
Omg, this exactly. @nytimes and @nytopinion are essentially producing a reality TV show instead of actual non-biased journalism. Which Tiki Torch will be snuffed out forever after they pretend to agonize over their decision? Find out on the installment of @TheWeekly!!
In fairness, an editorial board is by definition applying its bias. The question becomes what the foundation for its opinion are based on. In this instance, they would’ve been better served to scrap the Harry high school exercise.
They have no idea how much they're humiliating themselves.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.
