The framing of this article is very revealing of the author's bias, to say the least. The content of the document pertains to an "incident involving Kavanaugh and a woman while they were in high school." Yet, the intercept has gone w/ the "Feinstein is cagey!" angle.https://twitter.com/theintercept/status/1039990540157239299 …
-
-
Do you understand what is meant when someone criticizes the framing of an article? I criticized your choice 2 highlight Feinstein's actions over & above the assault allegations You are free to argue that your framing was correct, but don't act as if you don't understand my point
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Anyone who has written news stories is aware of the importance of what we call a "lede" -- the most important parts of the story that, well, leads off the article.
-
You're assuming the Intercept publishes news stories and has any awareness of this thing you call a "lede".
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
"Questions swirl around a possible new allegation relating to Kavanaugh's past."
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I like
@theintercept and support it financially but this is a very weak response. I'd hate to see you go GG and be so obsessed with bashing Dems that you miss big picture stuff like a rape allegation against Kavanaugh being more newsworthy than Feinstein's supposed secrecy.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
lol i think an allegation that, based on your description, appears to involve sexual assault is a more important point to highlight, but what do i know, i don't have a dick
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Clearly you haven't read your own comments/tweets section which reveals plenty of people did NOT read to the fourth paragraph. You write on the Internet and have a Twitter presence but you didn't know this?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The vast majority of readers don’t get past the headline of a given article, much less get four paragraphs deep. If your lede is misleading, you are spreading misinformation. As you well know.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Jesus man. What happened to you?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
So...any apology forthcoming, or is that too cruel a sentence to dole out to delicate writers?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Keep sending that resume to RT. Something will open up.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Someone is pissed because he got called out on another bullshit article, yet again.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
To be fair Ryan, you get close here -- it is indeed cruel to ask someone to read the Intercept for 4 grafs.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Disingenuous since there were only two responses to your tweet that apparently read the article. The rest were pavlovian responses to the headline
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I mean for what it's worth having to read through four of your paragraphs is kind of a chore...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.