The evidence against is: 1. It would conflict with your preconceived notions about what Delaware politics are like
-
-
Donald Trump? Great...
-
lol you really are just a shoe leather reporter with no agenda, huh?
-
You’re asking me in a thread with reporters from The Intercept if I’M the one with an agenda? For real, tho?
-
The thing is, when you read The Intercept, you know you are getting a certain perspective, but you are trying to frame your equally biased opinions as The Objective Truth
-
When you read The Intercept, you know you're getting propaganda, but when you listen to a real live local person who covered and now works in local government, it's pretend objectivity? It couldn't possibly be actual experience though, right?
-
I mean working for the local government alone is a pretty big conflict of interest
-
Working for local government is a conflict of interest in a conversation about how one gets elected to a government post... but openly supporting a candidate in “reporting” is ok because it’s blatant?pic.twitter.com/5rgXvMzu0E
-
It would have been good context to know you run into your state senator at the whole foods because you are part of the political class, not because Delaware is a little mayberry where everybody knows each other
- 6 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Uh I think everyone who donated $27 were under the impression he intended to win
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.