is there any polling that has Harris close to Carper or are you just going to skip over that part
-
-
-
There is no polling. But he has agreed to debate her. I guess covering that would be wrong? Following the arguments here to their conclusion is weird
-
except i never made that argument, but i know that doesn't matter to the intercept kr3w. Don't you have a candidate supported by EMILY'S list to write polemics against?
-
That you would suggest our reporting is sexist, in the context of this race, tells everything about your cynical approach. I’m sorry it bothers you so much that we’re covering her campaign. Do some soul searching.
-
where did I suggest your reporting was sexist? I'll wait
-
You told me to go find and Emilys List candidate to attack. What did you mean by that?
-
I meant that you have a pathological hatred of EMILY'S list, bc you're not a reporter so much as a glorified blogger trying to use the intercept as a pass-thru to support your preferred candidates.When an EMILY'S list candidate defeats your preferred one, you take it personally
-
None of that is true. But either way, why are you bringing it up in the context of Kerri Harris? I have enormous respect for what
@emilyslist has accomplished and respect for their broad mission, but disagree with them sometimes. You’re now blocked. - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
If you say so. The intercept’s coverage on the dem primaries this year reads like campaign statements from the candidates you’re trying to “put a spotlight on” but you do whatever you want to. How many winners have you “spotlighted” since the Va gov race started?
-
Let’s see: Dana Balter, Liuba Grechen Shirley, Ammar Campa-Najjar, Katie Porter, James Thompson, Ocasio-Cortez...I gotta get my kids to camp, can give you more later...
-
Plenty of losers(and ones who will lose) you’ve spotlighted. But again, up to you to ignore your mistakes like with Reality Winner
-
How is it a mistake to highlight a candidate who goes on to lose?We’re not guaranteeing a win, we’re saying this is an important progressive person to look at. Incumbents win at like 95%. So just ignore all the challenges?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thank you for your guilty acts!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Um, I mean yeah that’s what trying to boost means.
-
And if that’s your thing, that’s your thing, god knows there are worse ways to make a living than boosting good politicians, but don’t pretend like it’s journalism
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
WTH? So offering a candidate time is now the new wrong? Used to offer ALL candidates equal time. This thread shows me how crazy MSM has become. People believing positions should be bought it's crazy stuff.pic.twitter.com/HEnMcjGY5H
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.