"Crowley was a down-the-line liberal" -- what kind of nonsense is this? No he wasn't. He worked for Citigroup. Nice smart guy, but in favor of corporate concentration.https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/ocasio-cortez-just-did-democrats-a-big-favor/2018/06/27/dafdc498-7a4c-11e8-aeee-4d04c8ac6158_story.html?utm_term=.a19f06a7526f …
-
-
Did the demographics of the district change from Monday to Tuesday? People all of a sudden got browner and Crowley got whiter? If it was so obvious, why is this running after the election and not before?
-
3. In 85 percent of Dem House primaries this year, the candidate who raised the most money won. Of the exceptions, 70% are women. This is the year of the woman, not the anti-Democratic-establishment candidate.
-
It doesn’t have to be one or the other.
-
I do agree with you that there’s a progressive uprising. I just don’t see the pushback that you see.
-
I don’t think I follow. So you’d say that the DCCC and, say, Our Rev or Justice Democrats are actually in political alignment?
-
Crowley isn’t liberal. He was a leader of the New Dems. He was not a member of the progressive caucus. The meaning of the election isn’t obvious but Crowley isn’t a liberal by his own choice of caucus.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
I totally thought the same thing, but couldn't muster the energy to respond to the empty shopping bag of ideas that Dana plays so well.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
¡sin vergüenza! These people will continue to distort the truth to undermine the lefty movement and keep their neolib friends in power.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.