The candidate they endorsed is pro-choice and also supports the unionization efforts. This is, yet again, The Intercept, being disingenuous because Planned Parenthood didn’t endorse Emily Sirota.https://twitter.com/ryangrim/status/1008171126600683527 …
She has not supported the union’s request that PPRM recognize it and drop the NLRB action. If I’m wrong and she has, please correct me.
-
-
she supports the union, Ryan. Just because she hasn’t said the exact words you want her to say doesn’t mean she’s an evil woman who supports union busting. You’re being disingenuous and continuing to dig in your heels like this is gross.
-
You’re acting like PPRM taking this fight to the NLRB rather than recognizing the union is some minor procedural paperwork thing. It is everything. But yes, we’re getting nowhere.
-
No I’m not Ryan. This isn’t about PPRM handling this like shit. This is about you making this into a thing because they endorsed Wheeland.
-
Would you at least concede that Wheeland and Sirota have materially different positions on the union question and that it would be good if Wheeland would tell PPRM not to handle this so poorly?
-
You’re ability to move the goalposts around like checkers is honestly astounding.
-
It’s not a game, trying to find some common ground but nevermind
-
Don’t patronize me, Ryan.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
You have at any rate absolutely not made the case that the unionization is why PP endorsed Wheeland. You've spun a conspiracy from gossamer threads.
-
Exactly.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
You're wrong - just go to their Facebook page you hack.pic.twitter.com/SqmQpWYmuF
-
You'd think if Ryan were right, Mme Sirota would be getting more than 12% of her donations from the district.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
. It’s almost like they have a preference.