God. Yes! Thank you for saying it.
If we didn't link that was simply an error in moving as quickly as we could, we can add in links. Totally disagree that this was soft on Khanna.
-
-
As one of the people who felt totally burned by
@RoKhanna when he endorsed Crowley I didnt feel any better when he "dual endorsed" if anything I thought it was even more crass than the first endorsement. -
every statement about what we were saying was a generalization with no attribution and all of his defenses were linked to the statement he made and not to the original threads.
-
Well, the criticism was not complicated. How specific does it need to be? He says he's progressive and endorsed a corporate Democrat. That (entirely fair) criticism is easy to understand.That he made several layered defenses and then switched course was worth going into detail on
-
in the end your piece essentially summed it up that
@rokhanna was "responsive" and best of all that@Ocasio2018 was OK with it. and it genuinely appears to avoid linking to any of the actual criticism but very specifically links to all of@rokhanna defenses. -
and on that note. no point debating this to death. Have a great weekend.
-
You too, and thanks for flagging on the links. I've fixed that, added in the thread at the top. My own personal opinion is that I want politicians who cave to pressure from the left. Have a good weekend.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I really do enjoy your work and
@briebriejoy as well. I was just shocked when I saw this because I was part of the whole fight and I did not feel it characterized where we started or where it ended for those of us who were angry. I felt cheated by@rokhanna and then again by this - 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.