Robinson Woodward-Burns

@rwbdc

Assistant professor of political science . Studying US courts, the Constitution, civil rights, the ERA & APD. DC native, PhD, alum

Washington, DC
Vrijeme pridruživanja: svibanj 2018.

Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @rwbdc

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @rwbdc

  1. 1. velj

    Thoughtful coverage of the Bernie campaign by @samrjewler

    Poništi
  2. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    30. sij

    For an excellent piece on what happens next now that the ERA has (maybe?) passed the ratification threshold, check out Robinson Woodward-Burns's recent piece at :

    Poništi
  3. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    27. sij

    My new article: Ambiguities of Prophecy: Old Testament Rhetoric in the American Founding Era | Politics and Religion | Cambridge Core

    Poništi
  4. 24. sij

    "Republicans are trapped in a dangerous place: they represent a shrinking constituency that holds vast political power." Perhaps the best analogue to the modern GOP is the 1850s slaveholding South - a small bloc using the Senate and EC to cling to power

    Poništi
  5. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    Yesterday I wrote for about some of the issues that Sean Wilentz had in interpreting eighteenth-century newspapers in his critique of the . ICYMI, and then I’ll share a few more thoughts. /1

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  6. 24. sij

    Is this what the 80s was like?

    Poništi
  7. 23. sij

    Some impeachment context: when the Senate tried Secretary of War William Belknap in 1876 for soliciting cash favors, they heard more than 40 witnesses

    Poništi
  8. 22. sij

    "Nor do I think that the world has really retreated from liberal ideals; saying that is an academic fad, I believe." Soon - perhaps as soon as November - we'll abandon our end-of-liberalism fad, and move on as if it never happened

    Poništi
  9. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    21. sij

    Here is my contribution to the symposium on 's new book, The Enigma of Clarence Thomas. Head over to A House Divided () to read the other great reviews!

    Poništi
  10. 19. sij

    Curious whether the can get added to the Constitution? Check out my answer in The Atlantic

    Poništi
  11. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    19. sij

    One civil servant will determine if the ERA gets added to the Constitution—the question is which authority he’ll turn to for guidance, writes :

    Poništi
  12. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    18. sij

    Wondering about the National Archivist's role in the ratification of the ? takes a deep dive into what (doesn't) happens as soon as we finish ratifying

    Poništi
  13. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    18. sij

    Thoughtful case made by that Congress can lift the deadline for ratifying the ERA. Manipulating time this way would raise what we take to be the best evidence of broad, deep (and continuous?) deliberation over fundamental values.

    Poništi
  14. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    For the I wrote about how the new diverse coalition behind the Equal Rights Amendment, leaders like , would be unrecognizable to its author Alice Paul. Check it out!

    Poništi
  15. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    17. sij

    One civil servant will determine if the ERA gets added to the Constitution—the question is which authority he’ll turn to for guidance, writes :

    Poništi
  16. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    17. sij

    One civil servant will determine if the ERA gets added to the Constitution—the question is which authority he’ll turn to for guidance, writes :

    Poništi
  17. 17. sij

    Now that Virginia has voted to ratify the , the US archivist must decide whether to add the amendment to the Constitution. I outline how it could happen in :

    Poništi
  18. 16. sij
    Poništi
  19. 16. sij

    Yesterday Virginia voted to ratify the , and now can send the to the U.S. Archivist to be certified as part of the Constitution. What happens next? I spoke with ' on how the ERA could get certified

    Poništi
  20. 16. sij

    Just got to use the phrase "attorneys general" And in an article explaining why the 's ratification is likely valid no less

    Poništi

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·