Just realized that ton of @rustlang crates are treating `0.x.y` versions exactly the same as you would treat `x.y.z` versions.
-
-
Possibly. What initially prompted my comments were projects that have been stable in their 0.y state for a long time. Maybe I should encourage them to move to a major version scheme instead :)
- End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
