Which non-s-expr language do you think has good structural editing support?
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
I find that it perfectly fits the types of micro- and macro- edits that I make continually in the process of writing software (and in fact I think one could go so far as to say that it fits nearly all possible types of such edits). Certainly allows me to save a lot of time.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Granted, it doesn't have the super sophisticated type system that Haskell or Scala does. But I wouldn't be opposed if someone where to add that. And it is a WIP, but still kind of fun and useful.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Why did making `map` a protocol function necessitate changing the argument order?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @johanatan @rustlang
So it could be dispatched on the first argument. It's not just for sequences anymore.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Ah, so there’s a defmulti under the hood?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @johanatan @rustlang
In the 'runtime'. It's just like Clojure's protocol fn's. Any 'deftype' can provide an implementation for it. And the built-in types have it implemented where it makes sense.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Could you all untag me please? This is pretty far afield from rust. Thanks!
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.