Go check out @rustlang it's like C++ with consistent functional design and a Haskell-level rigorous compiler. (incl. monads and closures!)
-
-
Replying to @MarkHintz
@MarkHintz we don't have generic monads quite yet. Maybe someday, future isn't clear.1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
Replying to @MarkHintz
@MarkHintz it's like the difference between a generic and a concrete type: you can write the specific instance, but you can't say "for any
4:43 PM - 22 Feb 2016
0 replies
0 retweets
1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.