Is it just me who find this no_std split in @rustlang quite weird and cumbersome? Wouldn't it be easier for both crate authors and consumers if no_std would be merely a lint against using some APIs rather than completely separate namespace/crate(s)?
Replying to @RReverser
It’s not! There’s been talk of unifying core and std, via the “portability lint”. An RFC was accepted but never implemented...
4:58 PM - 19 Sep 2018
0 replies
0 retweets
7 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.