https://codecs.multimedia.cx/2018/05/rust-lifetimes-sugar/ …
@rustlang do you think would be acceptable for an rfc?
Without it is actually legal today in some circumstances, like fn foo(&self) -> Foo But we’re going to lint against that and make you write fn foo(&self) -> Foo<‘_> so you can see the borrow, for this reason
-
-
Sounds good to me. The important information remains and we have a nice "default to the marker above if omitted" that reduces the verboseness. Hopefully Kostya will be happy about it as well :)
-
I spoke with
@ManishEarth and he believes that the struct thing may have been postponed. Not a thing we’ve outright rejected at least!
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.