So many things wrong here - original authors refuse to share data/materials, reviewers imply that replication was intentionally tanked or done poorly, journal refuses to publish failed replication attempt. fortunately the paper found a good home at @eLifehttps://retractionwatch.com/2018/05/08/nature-says-it-wants-to-publish-replication-attempts-so-what-happened-when-a-group-of-authors-submitted-one-to-nature-neuroscience/ …
