In other words, it’s not quite as shut off from the rest of the web as it seems.
Another strike against the Slate story: Dyn says they’ve seen queries to http://mail1.trump-email.com that didn’t come from the IPs in the story.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
not sure where Dyn said this, but these IPs it mentions could be the "address book" of those authorized past the firewall.
-
they said it in an email to me — more extensive quote in my storyhttp://www.theverge.com/2016/11/1/13486596/trump-russia-alfabank-server-hotline-connection-debunk …
-
great article, thanks! I think your conclusion is spot on — the exact timing of the DNS lookups will disqualify a hypothesis
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@SwiftOnSecurity even a completely internal only system could have inquiries, a laptop goes home, isn't on vpn, need numbersThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Any official statement from them? Aggregate data (numbers of unique IPs) that they measured? Timeframe?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
For the story to be fake people with reputations went to great lengths to create fake info.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
how is this a strike? they just said that scans showed a restrictive firewall, not that nobody else did DNS lookups.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
And does this mean they are implicitly verifying the authenticity of the logs that were leaked?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.