Alexander’s position is almost certainly wrong about not removing. But it is staggeringly, horribly, pathetically wrong about not calling witnesses. Why not give voters a fuller picture even if you somehow vote to acquit?https://twitter.com/ThePlumLineGS/status/1223977549950222337 …
Somebody needs to directly rebut Lamar’s argument about precedent. He claims removal now would open the door to future, frivolous impeachments//
-
-
We have no evidence of impeachment being used excessively. The best case you have against its use is the Clinton one.
-
We are not impeaching Trump because Republicans lowered the bar in 1998.
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
The danger is closing the door to ever using the impeachment remedy for even the worst abuses. The next Democratic will have free reign to crush Republicans without mercy.//
-
Besides, in 1998 there was a truly frivolous impeachment and that president was safe from frivolous removal.
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.