SF D.A. Chesa Boudin's radical policies are killing innocent San Franciscans. It's time for him to go. If you agree, please share my blog post.https://davidsacks.medium.com/the-killer-d-a-54d4c4a5135f …
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @DavidSacks
Your view would resonate & receive broader support (outside tech bros) if you offer disruptive alternatives that strike a happy medium between decarceration & incarceration. 2/3 US jail population pre Covid was people waiting on trial. What’s the alternative?
2 replies 1 retweet 15 likes -
Replying to @mpactfactor @DavidSacks
The problem is a LOT of the people held are career criminals to begin with. They've been in and out of the system since they were teenagers. While their records are sealed, the cops know them. They ask DAs to hold them at a higher bail so that they stop harming the community.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
What's a "LOT"? What's the source of your data?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @GehaniNeil @facts16966471 and
Product Advisor to #Startups | ng-cpo.eth Retweeted Product Advisor to #Startups | ng-cpo.eth
Here the data on violent and non-violent for
#California. There was similar anti-@chesaboudin threadhttps://twitter.com/GehaniNeil/status/1346284638952517632?s=20 …Product Advisor to #Startups | ng-cpo.eth added,
Product Advisor to #Startups | ng-cpo.eth @GehaniNeilReplying to @LuigiCPAis that unusual? I think all attorneys do this, no?. Idk the + or - of this but seems like a systemic issue, if its an issue. I suspect he doesn't want the negative consequence of 3 strikes https://lao.ca.gov/2005/3_strikes/3_strikes_102005.htm … A large % is for non-violent/non-serious. pic.twitter.com/b7KPPBwWRk1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @GehaniNeil @mpactfactor and
The problem is its much easier to catch someone with possession of meth than it is to catch them while raping/murdering someone. What you're ONLY looking at is the possession of meth when there's a history of events they were involved that cops are aware of since they were kids.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @facts16966471 @GehaniNeil and
Are you arguing for a system where we can incarcerate people without conviction, based solely on the fact that they were convicted of something in the past?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @runako @GehaniNeil and
No I'm arguing that if they are a flight risk or a risk to society(after convincing the judge) its understandable to have a higher bail for them with restrictions. They only get incarcerated once the state proves their case.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @facts16966471 @GehaniNeil and
Understood. So you advocate for a tiered bail system where poorer people sit in jail until trial but rich people do not?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @runako @GehaniNeil and
I'm an advocate for the harmless citizens. My heart goes out to them first. If that tiered bail system keeps them safer(which it does) then I'm all for it. Unless you have a better idea?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
We don’t know that it does, because we haven’t tried an alternative. (The SF plan is incomplete at best.) My idea is to protect Constitutional rights for everyone first. A wealth-based system doesn’t do that. Need to solve in the context of Constitution.
-
-
Replying to @runako @facts16966471 and
Or we need to amend the Constitution to reflect that we don’t pretend to treat people equally.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.