This deserves a blog post but who has time for that, so here's a bit more context for this data.
-
-
Replying to @sarahmei
There are many definitions for generations. I think of them as spikes in the birth rate. This means they aren't continuous; there are gaps.
2 replies 2 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @sarahmei
It makes sense to think of them this way, because as the babies born in that spike get older, media & experiences & pop culture follow.
1 reply 2 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @sarahmei
In the gaps are the people who identify either way, depending largely on whether they have older or younger friends.
1 reply 1 retweet 8 likes -
Replying to @sarahmei
Or sometimes, they don't identify with either side. That's me. I was born where that graph bottoms out.
8 replies 3 retweets 10 likes -
Replying to @sarahmei
Media aimed at genX, like The Breakfast Club, wasn't aimed at people my age. We were too young when it came out. Older siblings, maybe.
6 replies 2 retweets 14 likes -
Replying to @sarahmei
At the same time, we were too old (or pretended to be) for the kids media renaissance in the late 80s. That was for millennials.
1 reply 1 retweet 5 likes -
Replying to @sarahmei
In any case, no matter how you mark the cutoffs for boomers, genXers, and millennials, genX is a blip in between two behemoths.
2 replies 1 retweet 18 likes -
Replying to @sarahmei
There are actually more millennials than there _ever_ were baby boomers.
2 replies 3 retweets 14 likes -
Replying to @sarahmei
Assuming a longer average lifespan, that means millennials will be even more of a force (economic, social, etc.) than the boomers were.
4 replies 6 retweets 15 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
| Prev