Do you take issue with that claim? It is a different 'path' towards an extensible editor that the one vim/sam or Emacs took, is it not? And although it may be limited to a text interface it does achieve the goal of being a fungible, easy to extend 'interface'
"pushing 30 years old but arguably still radical"https://twitter.com/rob_pike/status/1055599175235100672 …
-
-
-
No, I agree!
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.