also: the jar thing isn’t explicitly taught, but it is *learned* – as a kid I remember struggling with the “how” part of opening containers just as much as with the lack of required physical strength
-
-
-
I find the question of what’s “intuitive” often quite distracting. In contrast, thinking about the nature of time and attention required to learn is often quite clarifying, because that makes explicit the path-dependent nature of some of these questions…
-
Which is just to say both that I agree that “intuitive” is not inherent _and_ that practically it’s often best to treat it as such. …
-
An example which I first ran across via
@worrydream, http://lua-users.org/lists/lua-l/2008-02/msg00247.html … — I think that it’s both true empirically and obviously missing a point ontologically.pic.twitter.com/axisWxG2qE
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.